RapMan 3.1 3D Printer Kit Documentation – Bits From Bytes Legacy

RapMan 3.1 3D Printer Kit Documentation

Historical preservation of one of the first commercially available RepRap-based 3D printer kits


The 3D Printer That Democratized Desktop Manufacturing

The RapMan 3.1 3D printer kit by Bits From Bytes represents a pivotal moment in the democratization of additive manufacturing. Released in 2009, this kit-based printer made professional 3D printing technology accessible to educators, hobbyists, and small businesses for the first time, with a revolutionary price point of £750 ($1,300).

This comprehensive documentation preserves the technical specifications, assembly process, and operational guidelines for the RapMan 3.1—a machine that accounted for 17% of all 3D printer sales worldwide in 2010, ranking second in total global shipments according to the authoritative Wohlers Report.

The RapMan 3.1 wasn’t just another 3D printer; it was the bridge between academic RepRap research and commercial desktop manufacturing. While coverage from The Guardian, The New York Times, Scientific American, and dozens of other major publications validated its significance, the real impact came from thousands of students, makers, and early adopters who used these machines to learn engineering principles, prototype products, and explore the possibilities of digital fabrication.


Historical Context: From RepRap to Commercial Reality

The RepRap Revolution

The RapMan 3.1’s story begins at the University of Bath in the United Kingdom, where Dr. Adrian Bowyer launched the RepRap (Replicating Rapid-prototyper) project in 2005. The ambitious goal: create a self-replicating 3D printer that could print most of its own components, making the technology freely available to anyone.

By 2008, the RepRap Darwin had proven the concept. However, sourcing parts, understanding complex documentation, and achieving reliable prints remained significant barriers for non-technical users. This gap in the market presented a clear opportunity.

Bits From Bytes: Commercializing Open Source

In December 2008, Ian Adkins and Iain Major founded Bits From Bytes Ltd in Clevedon, North Somerset, UK, with a clear mission: transform the RepRap concept into a commercially viable product that anyone could assemble and use. The company became the first to offer a complete 3D printer kit for under £1,000, a price point that fundamentally changed the industry’s accessibility.

The RapMan 3.1 featured several key improvements over DIY RepRap builds:

  • Complete kit packaging: Every component included, from acrylic frame pieces to electronics
  • Professional documentation: Comprehensive assembly manuals with 3D illustrations
  • Standalone operation: G-code execution from SD cards without requiring a connected PC
  • OLED interface: User-friendly display for printer control
  • Laser-cut acrylic frame: Consistent quality and easier assembly than 3D-printed parts
  • Pre-configured firmware: Ready to use out of the box

Industry Recognition and Impact

The RapMan 3.1’s impact was immediate and significant. In 2010, the printer won the Digital Devices Award at the BETT Awards—often called the education “Oscars”—recognizing its value in classroom environments. Educational institutions worldwide embraced the platform for STEM education, while makers and small businesses used it for rapid prototyping and small-scale production.

The commercial success attracted major industry attention. On October 5, 2010, 3D Systems Corporation acquired Bits From Bytes in what Kerry Stevenson of Fabbaloo called a “Blockbuster Announcement”—the largest corporate acquisition in the 3D printer space at that time.

According to the official SEC filing, 3D Systems’ CEO Abe Reichental stated: “With the acquisition of Bits From Bytes, 3D Systems takes the next major step towards democratizing access to 3D printing—a stated strategic direction and ongoing commitment.”


Technical Specifications: Engineering Details

Build Volume and Mechanical Specifications

The RapMan 3.1 offered impressive build capabilities for its class and era:

Extrusion System

The heart of the RapMan 3.1 was its thermoplastic extrusion system, engineered for reliability:

  • Filament Diameter: 3.0 mm (standard for RepRap-era printers)
  • Nozzle Temperature Range: Up to 260°C
  • Nozzle Diameter: 0.5 mm standard (replaceable)
  • Extruder Type: Wade’s geared extruder design
  • Drive System: NEMA 17 stepper motor with gear reduction
  • Hot End: All-metal construction with embedded thermistor
  • Heating Element: Resistor-based with PID temperature control

Compatible Materials

The RapMan 3.1 supported multiple thermoplastic materials:

ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene)

  • Print temperature: 235-250°C
  • Bed adhesion: Requires heated surface or adhesive
  • Properties: Strong, durable, slight chemical odor
  • Post-processing: Acetone vapor smoothing possible
  • Colors: Available in white, black, blue, red, yellow, green, translucent

PLA (Polylactic Acid)

  • Print temperature: 180-200°C
  • Bed adhesion: Good adhesion to various surfaces
  • Properties: Biodegradable, minimal warping, pleasant smell
  • Post-processing: Limited smoothing options
  • Colors: Available in solid and translucent variants

Other Materials (with modifications):

  • Polypropylene (experimental)
  • Polyethylene (experimental)
  • Nylon (with upgraded hot end)

Electronics and Control System

Main Controller Board:

  • Custom Bits From Bytes board based on RepRap electronics
  • ATmega microcontroller (Atmel AVR architecture)
  • Dedicated stepper motor drivers for each axis
  • Integrated power supply management
  • SD card slot for G-code file storage

User Interface:

  • OLED graphical display (128×64 pixels)
  • Rotary encoder knob with push button
  • Menu-driven interface for printer control
  • File selection and print initiation without PC
  • Real-time temperature and position monitoring

Connectivity:

  • SD card slot (primary method for file transfer)
  • USB connection (firmware updates and direct control)
  • No network connectivity (added in later commercial evolution)

Power Requirements

  • Input Voltage: 110-240V AC (universal power supply)
  • Power Consumption: ~150W during printing
  • Heated Build Platform: Optional upgrade, 200W additional

Assembly and Build Process: A Three-Day Journey

What’s Included in the Kit

According to the comprehensive assembly documentation from EduTech Wiki, the RapMan 3.1 kit arrived in a compact, plastic-wrapped cardboard box containing:

Mechanical Components:

  • Laser-cut acrylic frame pieces (pre-cut, precision tolerances)
  • Linear bearings and smooth rods for all axes
  • Timing belts (GT2 or T2.5 profile)
  • Pulleys and idlers
  • Ball bearings for moving parts
  • Threaded rods for Z-axis
  • Hardware kit (bolts, nuts, washers, all organized)

Electronics Package:

  • Main controller board with firmware pre-installed
  • Stepper motors (NEMA 17, five total: X, Y, Z, and extruder)
  • Motor driver boards
  • Extruder hot end assembly
  • Thermistor and heating element
  • Power supply unit
  • Wiring harnesses (color-coded for easy identification)
  • OLED display module

Build Platform:

  • Acrylic print bed
  • Z-axis mounting hardware
  • Adjustment springs and thumbscrews

Tools and Accessories:

  • Allen key set
  • Spanners/wrenches
  • SD card (512MB-2GB typical)
  • USB cable
  • Sample filament spools (typically 1kg ABS)

Documentation:

  • Build Manual (printed, with 3D PDF models)
  • Electronics Manual
  • Hot End Assembly Manual
  • Quick Start Guide
  • G-code reference sheet

Assembly Timeline and Process

The RapMan 3.1 assembly typically required 2-3 full days for two people working together, making it an excellent educational experience in mechanical engineering and electronics integration.

Day 1: Cartesian Frame Construction (6-8 hours)

The first phase focused on building the mechanical frame—the “Cartesian robot” that would position the extruder and build platform:

  1. Base Assembly: Connecting the main acrylic frame pieces using precision-drilled mounting holes
  2. X-Axis Rail Installation: Mounting smooth rods and installing linear bearings
  3. Y-Axis Construction: Similar process for forward/backward motion
  4. Z-Axis Integration: Installing threaded rods and coupling to stepper motors
  5. Belt Installation: Threading timing belts through pulleys with proper tension
  6. Motor Mounting: Securing NEMA 17 stepper motors to frame

Critical Skill: Understanding bolt tension. The golden rule from experienced builders: “Finger tight, then add 1/2 turn with a wrench.” Over-tightening could crack acrylic; under-tightening caused mechanical play.

Day 2: Electronics Integration (4-6 hours)

The second phase involved connecting the electronic subsystems:

  1. Controller Board Installation: Mounting the main board in accessible location
  2. Motor Wiring: Connecting stepper motors following color-coded documentation
  3. Extruder Assembly: Building the hot end according to specialized manual
  4. Thermistor Installation: Critical for temperature sensing
  5. Display Connection: Mounting OLED screen and connecting ribbon cable
  6. Power Supply Integration: Connecting and securing PSU safely
  7. Cable Management: Routing wires to prevent interference with moving parts

Common Challenge: Pink thermistor wires were sometimes missing from early kits, requiring support requests to Bits From Bytes.

Day 3: Calibration and First Prints (6-8 hours)

The final phase focused on calibration—arguably the most critical step:

  1. Bed Leveling: Using the “five paper sheets method” (5 sheets of 70gsm paper = ~0.5mm gap between nozzle and bed at all positions)
  2. Axis Homing: Setting X/Y/Z home positions with proper offsets
  3. Temperature Calibration: Verifying thermistor readings and PID tuning
  4. Extrusion Testing: Manual extrusion to verify proper flow rate
  5. Test Print Execution: Running the included test file (typically a small calibration cube)
  6. Print Surface Preparation: Sanding print bed with fine sandpaper for adhesion
  7. Belt Tension Adjustment: Fine-tuning for optimal print quality

Educational Value of the Build

The assembly process itself became a cornerstone of the RapMan’s educational appeal. Students learned:

  • Mechanical Engineering: Understanding linear motion systems, belt drives, gear ratios
  • Electronics Integration: Wiring, polarity, signal paths, power management
  • Problem-Solving: Troubleshooting assembly issues, interpreting documentation
  • Patience and Precision: The importance of careful, methodical work
  • Teamwork: Coordinating with partners during complex assembly steps

As EduTech Wiki documented, many educational institutions found the assembly process as valuable as the final printing capability.


Printing Workflow: From CAD Model to Physical Object

The Five-Step Process

The RapMan 3.1 printing workflow represented the state-of-the-art for desktop 3D printing in 2009-2011:

Step 1: 3D Model Creation or Acquisition

Users created or obtained 3D models using various methods:

  • CAD Software: SolidWorks, Autodesk Inventor, Alibre Design
  • Beginner-Friendly Options: Google SketchUp, Tinkercad
  • Model Repositories: Thingiverse (with “rapman” or “reprap” tags)
  • 3D Scanning: David Laserscanner (popular low-cost option)

All models needed to be exported to STL (stereolithography) format—the universal 3D printing file format.

Step 2: STL File Preparation

Before slicing, STL files often required repair and manipulation:

  • Netfabb Studio (free version): Repairing mesh errors, resizing models, repositioning
  • Meshlab: Combining multiple objects, basic mesh operations
  • Mesh Validation: Ensuring watertight geometry, correcting normals

The RapMan’s coordinate system placed the origin (0,0,0) at the center of the build platform, requiring proper positioning of models.

Step 3: G-Code Generation (Slicing)

This critical step converted 3D models into machine instructions. Three main software options existed:

BfB Axon (Recommended for beginners, free from Bits From Bytes):

  • Graphical frontend for Skeinforge
  • Simplified parameter selection
  • Profile presets for different materials
  • Windows-only application
  • Regular firmware updates via BfB Technical Resources hub

Skeinforge (Advanced users, free open-source):

  • Powerful Python-based toolchain
  • Extensive customization options
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Active development community

Netfabb Engine for RapMan (Commercial option):

  • Professional-grade slicing
  • Intuitive interface
  • Faster processing than Skeinforge
  • Cost: ~£50-150 depending on version

The slicing software performed several critical operations:

  • Slicing the model into 2D layers (typically 0.2-0.3mm thick)
  • Generating toolpaths for each layer
  • Creating support structures if needed
  • Calculating print time and material usage
  • Generating raft (foundation layer for better adhesion)
  • Producing G-code file with all machine instructions

Step 4: File Transfer to SD Card

Once G-code generation completed:

  1. Save the .gcode file (sometimes .bfb extension)
  2. Copy file to SD card (formatted FAT16 or FAT32)
  3. Safely eject SD card from computer
  4. Insert into RapMan 3.1’s SD card slot

Step 5: Print Execution

Using the OLED interface:

  1. Power on the RapMan 3.1
  2. Navigate menu with rotary encoder
  3. Select “Print from SD”
  4. Choose desired file
  5. Monitor first layer carefully for proper adhesion
  6. Allow print to complete (hours for complex models)
  7. Wait for cool-down before removing print

Given the RapMan 3.1’s conservative print speed (~2.47 mm/s), print times were substantial:

  • Small calibration cube (20mm): 1-2 hours
  • Phone case: 3-5 hours
  • Mechanical part (100mm): 8-12 hours
  • Complex assemblies: 12-24+ hours

However, the reliability of these slower speeds meant higher success rates—a critical factor for educational environments where failed prints wasted valuable time.


Materials and Calibration: Mastering the Variables

ABS vs. PLA: Material Selection Guide

The two primary materials for the RapMan 3.1 had distinct characteristics and optimal use cases:

ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) – The Industrial Choice

Advantages:

  • High impact resistance and durability
  • Excellent mechanical properties for functional parts
  • Post-processing options (acetone vapor smoothing)
  • Good temperature resistance (heat deflection)
  • Widely available in multiple colors

Challenges:

  • Strong chemical odor during printing (requires ventilation)
  • Prone to warping without proper bed adhesion
  • Higher temperature requirements (235-250°C)
  • Requires proper first-layer adhesion technique

Optimal Settings (according to extensive EduTech Wiki documentation):

  • Extruder temperature: 247-248°C (calibrate for your specific machine)
  • Raft temperature: 235-240°C (lower to prevent over-adhesion)
  • Bed surface: Lightly sanded, clean acrylic
  • Extrusion multiplier: 1.0-1.1 (adjust based on line width)
  • Print speed: Default settings (~2.47 mm/s)

PLA (Polylactic Acid) – The Easy-Print Alternative

Advantages:

  • Minimal warping (lower thermal contraction)
  • Pleasant, slightly sweet smell during printing
  • Biodegradable (corn or sugar-based polymer)
  • Excellent surface finish straight off the printer
  • Lower temperature requirements (180-200°C)
  • Better first-layer adhesion on various surfaces

Challenges:

  • Lower heat resistance (softens around 60°C)
  • More brittle than ABS (lower impact resistance)
  • Limited post-processing options
  • Can absorb moisture from air (requires dry storage)

Optimal Settings:

  • Extruder temperature: 185-195°C
  • Bed adhesion: Works well on plain acrylic or painter’s tape
  • Cooling: Fan cooling beneficial for overhangs
  • Retraction: Important to prevent stringing

Critical Calibration Procedures

Bed Leveling: The Foundation of Success

Proper bed leveling was essential for successful prints. The recommended method:

  1. Home all axes to establish reference points
  2. Move print head to first corner position
  3. Place 5 sheets of 70gsm paper between nozzle and bed
  4. Adjust bed height with thumbscrews until paper slides with slight resistance
  5. Repeat for all four corners and center point
  6. Iterate until all positions show consistent gap
  7. Power cycle the printer to save settings

Pro Tip: Move the print head slowly when checking positions to avoid damaging the board or nozzle.

Temperature Calibration: Finding Your Machine’s Sweet Spot

Each RapMan 3.1 had slightly different optimal temperatures due to:

  • Thermistor positioning variations
  • Wiring length affecting resistance
  • Ambient temperature conditions
  • Hot end assembly differences

Calibration process:

  1. Start with recommended temperatures (247°C for ABS)
  2. Perform manual extrusion test
  3. Measure actual extrusion rate (should achieve ~0.5 cm/second)
  4. Adjust temperature ±2°C if needed
  5. Test print and observe: too cold = poor adhesion between layers; too hot = excessive stringing and oozing
  6. Document optimal settings for future reference

As EduTech Wiki emphasized: “2 degrees make a difference”—small temperature adjustments had significant impact.

Raft Adhesion: The Goldilocks Problem

The raft (foundation layers beneath the print) presented a dual challenge:

Too Little Adhesion:

  • Raft lifts from bed during printing
  • Part warps or shifts mid-print
  • Print failure

Too Much Adhesion:

  • Impossible to remove print without damage
  • Requires knife or force to separate
  • Risk of breaking printed parts

Solution strategies:

  • Temperature tuning: Lower raft temperature by 5-10°C versus main print
  • Extrusion rate: Reduce flow rate slightly for raft layers (setting S400 vs S550)
  • Surface preparation: Light sanding with fine-grit sandpaper, clean with isopropyl alcohol
  • Release agents: Some users applied diluted PVA glue or hairspray

G-Code Manual Adjustments

Advanced users frequently edited G-code files directly to optimize prints. Common manual modifications included:

gcode

; Example temperature adjustment in G-code
M104 S240.0  ; Set extruder temperature to 240°C
G1 X22.76 Y-18.7 Z1.95 F960.0  ; Move to position
G1 X22.89 Y-18.64 Z2.0 F960.0  ; Execute toolpath

Key G-code commands for RapMan:

  • M104 S[temp]: Set extruder temperature
  • M140 S[temp]: Set heated bed temperature (if installed)
  • G1 X[pos] Y[pos] Z[pos] F[speed]: Controlled move
  • G28: Home all axes
  • M106 S[value]: Fan speed control (0-255)

Software Ecosystem: Tools for Success

BfB Axon: The Official Solution

Bits From Bytes developed Axon as their official slicing software, providing a user-friendly entry point into 3D printing workflow:

Key Features:

  • Graphical front-end for Skeinforge engine
  • Material preset profiles (ABS, PLA, custom)
  • Simplified parameter interface
  • Visual STL model preview
  • Estimated print time calculation
  • Direct G-code export to SD card
  • Free firmware updates through BfB Technical Resources hub

System Requirements:

  • Windows XP/Vista/7 (Windows-only)
  • 1GB RAM minimum
  • 100MB disk space
  • USB port for updates

Limitations:

  • Windows exclusivity (limiting for Mac/Linux users)
  • Less control than direct Skeinforge usage
  • Occasional bugs with complex geometries

Skeinforge: The Power User’s Choice

For users seeking maximum control, Skeinforge offered unparalleled customization:

Architecture:

  • Python-based script toolchain
  • Modular plugin system
  • Cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux)
  • Open-source with active development
  • Extensive documentation community

Key Plugins:

  • Carve: Convert STL to layers
  • Chamber: Temperature management
  • Fill: Infill pattern generation
  • Multiply: Duplicate objects on build plate
  • Raft: Foundation layer generation
  • Speed: Velocity optimization
  • Temperature: Layer-by-layer thermal control

Learning Curve: Steeper initial setup, but rewarded advanced users with precise control over every aspect of the print process.

CAD Software Compatibility

The RapMan 3.1’s STL-based workflow ensured compatibility with virtually any 3D modeling software:

Professional CAD:

  • SolidWorks: Industry-standard mechanical CAD
  • Autodesk Inventor: Parametric design
  • Alibre Design: Affordable alternative
  • Creo: Enterprise-level engineering

Beginner-Friendly:

  • Google SketchUp: Free, intuitive 3D modeling
  • Tinkercad: Browser-based, education-focused
  • FreeCAD: Open-source parametric modeler

Artistic/Organic Modeling:

  • Blender: Free, powerful 3D creation suite
  • Sculptris: Digital sculpting
  • ZBrush: Professional character modeling

Mesh Repair and Manipulation

STL files from various sources often required repair before printing:

Netfabb Studio Basic (Free):

  • Automatic mesh repair
  • Scaling and positioning tools
  • Support structure generation
  • Wall thickness analysis
  • STL file combination

Meshlab (Free, Open-Source):

  • Advanced mesh operations
  • Combining multiple objects
  • Surface reconstruction
  • Cleaning and optimization

Community-Developed Tools

The RapMan community created numerous utilities:

  • Custom firmware modifications
  • G-code optimization scripts
  • Material profile libraries
  • Print failure analysis tools
  • Calibration wizards

Troubleshooting Guide: Common Issues and Solutions

Raft Adhesion Problems

Issue: Raft Won’t Stick to Build Platform

Symptoms: Raft lifts during first layer, warps at corners, or moves during print

Solutions:

  1. Increase raft temperature by 5-10°C
  2. Verify bed is properly leveled (check all five points)
  3. Clean print surface thoroughly with isopropyl alcohol
  4. Sand print bed lightly with 200-300 grit sandpaper
  5. Apply thin layer of diluted PVA glue or hairspray
  6. Reduce print speed for first layer

Issue: Raft Sticks Too Well

Symptoms: Unable to remove print without force, risk of part damage

Solutions:

  1. Decrease raft temperature by 5-10°C
  2. Reduce extrusion rate for raft layers (adjust multiplier to 0.9)
  3. Apply release agent (talcum powder or specialized spray)
  4. Wait for complete cool-down before removal
  5. Flex build platform to break adhesion
  6. Use thin putty knife or spatula carefully

Warping and Layer Delamination

Causes:

  • Insufficient bed adhesion
  • Temperature too low
  • Drafts or cooling air
  • Large flat bottom surfaces

Solutions:

  • Increase print temperature 2-5°C
  • Ensure draft-free environment
  • Add brim or raft for better adhesion
  • Design parts with chamfered corners
  • Split large flat objects into smaller components

Stringing and Oozing

Causes:

  • Temperature too high
  • Insufficient retraction
  • Slow travel moves
  • Material moisture absorption

Solutions:

  • Decrease temperature 5-10°C
  • Enable and tune retraction settings (2-5mm typical)
  • Increase travel speed in slicer
  • Store filament in dry environment with desiccant

Layer Misalignment

Causes:

  • Loose belts
  • Mechanical obstructions
  • Electrical interference
  • Stepper motor overheating

Solutions:

  • Check and tighten all belts following the assembly manual guidance
  • Verify smooth rod cleanliness and lubrication
  • Ensure proper cable management (no interference with moving parts)
  • Add cooling to stepper motor drivers if overheating

Mechanical Maintenance

Regular Maintenance Schedule:

After Every 10 Hours of Printing:

  • Clean print bed with isopropyl alcohol
  • Remove any accumulated plastic from nozzle
  • Check belt tension on all axes
  • Verify smooth motion without binding

Monthly Maintenance:

  • Lubricate linear bearings with light machine oil
  • Tighten any loose bolts or connections
  • Clean smooth rods with isopropyl alcohol
  • Inspect wiring for wear or damage
  • Update firmware if new version available

Quarterly Deep Maintenance:

  • Complete mechanical inspection
  • Replace worn belts if showing damage
  • Clean electronics from dust accumulation
  • Verify electrical connections
  • Recalibrate bed leveling

Electronics Troubleshooting

Display Not Responding

Checks:

  1. Verify power supply connection
  2. Check ribbon cable connection to controller board
  3. Reseat display module
  4. Test with firmware reset
  5. Contact technical support if persistent

Motors Not Moving

Checks:

  1. Verify stepper motor connections (correct polarity)
  2. Check motor driver boards for proper seating
  3. Test motor independently
  4. Verify firmware settings for motor steps/mm
  5. Check for mechanical binding

Educational Impact: Transforming STEM Learning

Classroom Integration

The RapMan 3.1’s design philosophy explicitly targeted educational environments, offering unique pedagogical advantages:

Transparent Construction: Unlike enclosed commercial printers, the RapMan’s open acrylic frame allowed students to observe the entire printing process, reinforcing understanding of:

  • Additive manufacturing principles
  • X/Y/Z Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Material phase changes (solid filament → molten plastic → solid object)
  • Mechanical systems in action

Hands-On Assembly: The 2-3 day build process became a comprehensive engineering course:

  • Reading technical documentation
  • Following assembly sequences
  • Tool usage and safety
  • Problem-solving when steps unclear
  • Teamwork and communication
  • Attention to detail and precision

Cross-Curricular Applications:

Mathematics:

  • 3D coordinate geometry
  • Measurement and precision
  • Scale and proportion in design
  • Calculating volumes and material usage

Physics:

  • Heat transfer and thermal expansion
  • Materials science (polymer properties)
  • Motion and mechanics
  • Electrical circuits

Computer Science:

  • CAD software proficiency
  • G-code programming fundamentals
  • File management and formats
  • Troubleshooting logical errors

Design Technology:

  • Product development process
  • Iterative design methodology
  • Prototyping and testing
  • Manufacturing constraints

Success Stories in Education

According to industry documentation, Bits From Bytes worked closely with educational professionals to ensure the RapMan met real classroom needs. The result: thousands of schools worldwide integrated the technology into their curricula.

University Research Applications:

  • EduTech Wiki at the University of Geneva created comprehensive documentation based on their institutional RapMan 3.1
  • Engineering departments used the platform for rapid prototyping courses
  • Design schools incorporated 3D printing into product development programs

Secondary Education:

  • STEM programs used assembly as team-building exercises
  • Design & Technology courses integrated 3D printing workflows
  • After-school maker clubs built around RapMan capabilities

Long-Term Educational Value

Even after being discontinued following 3D Systems’ acquisition, many RapMan 3.1 units continued serving educational missions. The Centre national des arts plastiques (CNAP) in France maintains a RapMan as part of their permanent art technology collection, recognizing its historical significance.


Industry Influence: Shaping the Desktop 3D Printing Revolution

Market Impact and Competitive Landscape

The RapMan 3.1’s commercial success fundamentally altered the 3D printing industry’s trajectory. According to the 2010 Wohlers Report, an authoritative industry analysis, Bits From Bytes captured 17% of global 3D printer unit sales in their first full year—an unprecedented achievement for a startup.

Market Position 2009-2010:

  • #2 globally by unit shipments (second only to 3D Systems’ professional line)
  • #1 in affordable desktop segment (competing primarily with MakerBot)
  • First European manufacturer of consumer-grade 3D printers
  • Price leader: £750 ($1,300) vs. $5,000-15,000 for alternatives

The 3D Systems Acquisition: A Turning Point

On October 5, 2010, 3D Systems Corporation’s acquisition of Bits From Bytes represented what Fabbaloo called a “Blockbuster Announcement”—the largest corporate maneuver in the desktop 3D printing space to that date.

Strategic Rationale:

From 3D Systems’ perspective (according to SEC filings):

  • Entry into the rapidly growing consumer/educational market
  • Access to proven open-source technology platform
  • Established distribution channels globally
  • “Democratization” of 3D printing as stated company goal
  • Technology complement to existing Stereolithography portfolio

From Bits From Bytes’ perspective:

  • Financial backing for accelerated development
  • Global sales and marketing infrastructure
  • Technical resources from industry leader
  • Validation of their approach and technology

Post-Acquisition Evolution:

The acquisition’s aftermath proved complex:

  • RapMan production continued initially from Clevedon headquarters
  • Ian Adkins and core team retained
  • 3D Systems later developed the “Cube” printer line partly based on BfB technology
  • RapMan and BfB 3000 product lines eventually discontinued (~2013)
  • Technology and expertise absorbed into 3D Systems’ broader portfolio

Influence on Competitors and Market Development

The RapMan 3.1’s success and subsequent acquisition sent shockwaves through the emerging desktop 3D printing industry:

MakerBot Industries (USA):

  • Direct competitor in maker/hobbyist space
  • Learned from BfB’s successful kit approach
  • Eventually acquired by Stratasys in 2013 (similar trajectory to BfB)
  • Moved toward enclosed, consumer-focused designs

Ultimaker (Netherlands):

  • Entered market with similar open-frame philosophy
  • Emphasized open-source ethos more strongly
  • Focused on reliability and build quality
  • Became dominant European player post-BfB

RepRap Community:

  • Validated that commercial RepRap derivatives could succeed
  • Inspired numerous other commercial ventures (PrintrBot, Robo 3D, etc.)
  • Demonstrated value of comprehensive documentation and support
  • Proved educational market viability

Legacy Technology Contributions

The RapMan 3.1’s technical innovations influenced subsequent printer designs:

Standalone Operation: SD card-based printing without PC connection became industry standard Open Build Volume: Transparent frames for education/observation widely copied Kit Model Economics: Demonstrated viability of DIY assembly for price reduction Comprehensive Documentation: Set expectations for detailed assembly guides Community Support: Forums and wikis as crucial product support infrastructure

Cultural Impact: Maker Movement Validation

Beyond technical specifications, the RapMan 3.1 played a crucial role in legitimizing the maker movement and desktop fabrication:

  • Major media coverage (Guardian, New York Times, Scientific American) brought 3D printing to mainstream awareness
  • Educational institution adoption provided credibility
  • Successful commercial viability proved desktop 3D printing wasn’t just hobbyist tinkering
  • £750 price point made technology accessible to middle-class consumers and schools

Modern Alternatives in 2025: The Evolution of Desktop 3D Printing

The 3D printing landscape has transformed dramatically since the RapMan 3.1’s 2009 debut. Today’s printers offer capabilities that would have seemed impossible 15 years ago—yet the fundamental principles and workflows remain remarkably consistent with what Bits From Bytes pioneered.

Direct Descendants: The Prusa i3 Family

Prusa i3 MK4 (2023-present)

Active community support and continuous development

Heritage: Direct evolution of RepRap Prusa i3 design, itself descended from RepRap Mendel

Price: ~$800 (kit) / $1,100 (assembled)

Philosophy: Open-source ethos maintained, extensive documentation

Key Advantages over RapMan 3.1:

Automatic bed leveling with load cell sensor

Pressure advance for perfect extrusion

Network connectivity and monitoring

Input shaping for faster speeds without ringing

32-bit controller vs. 8-bit

Modern Budget Options: Accessibility Evolved

Creality Ender 3 V3 Series (~$200-350)

  • Represents the extreme democratization of 3D printing
  • Price point ~1/5 of original RapMan
  • CoreXY kinematics (different from Cartesian)
  • Faster speeds than RapMan with modern motion control
  • Huge user community and upgrade ecosystem

Bambu Lab P1S (~$600)

  • Multi-color capable out of box
  • Enclosed design (better for ABS)
  • Print speeds up to 500 mm/s
  • AI-powered failure detection
  • Automatic material switching

The Trade-offs: What Was Lost

While modern printers dramatically outperform the RapMan 3.1 in specifications, some valuable aspects were sacrificed:

Transparency and Education:

  • Enclosed designs hide the process
  • Automatic calibration removes learning opportunities
  • Pre-assembled units skip the assembly education
  • Proprietary systems reduce tinkering potential

Serviceability:

  • Many modern printers use proprietary parts
  • Enclosed electronics harder to diagnose/repair
  • Firmware increasingly locked down
  • Planned obsolescence more common

Community Philosophy:

  • Shift from open-source community to commercial products
  • Less documentation sharing between manufacturers
  • Reduced inter-brand compatibility
  • Diminished “right to repair” ethos

Choosing a Modern Alternative: Decision Framework

If Educational Value is Priority: → Prusa i3 MK4 (maintains open-source philosophy, excellent documentation, assembly option available)

If Budget is Constrained: → Creality Ender 3 V3 (incredible value, massive community support, upgrade path)

If Speed and Convenience Matter Most: → Bambu Lab P1S/X1C (fastest speeds, best automation, enclosed)

If Preserving RapMan Spirit: → Prusa i3 MK4 Kit (closest to original DIY assembly experience with modern capabilities)

The RapMan 3.1’s Enduring Relevance

Despite being 15+ years old, RapMan 3.1 units still operate in:

  • Museum collections (CNAP France)
  • Educational institutions (teaching 3D printing history)
  • Maker spaces (functional vintage equipment)
  • Private collections (early adopters’ nostalgia)

Some enthusiasts have even upgraded RapMan units with modern electronics (32-bit boards, modern firmware) while preserving the original mechanical frame—a testament to the quality of the original design.


Community and Resources: Where to Learn More

Historical Documentation Archives

EduTech Wiki (University of Geneva)

RepRap.org Wiki

  • RapMan overview and context
  • Links to original RepRap Darwin design
  • Community firmware modifications
  • Historical discussions and development

Archived Bits From Bytes Resources

  • Original website preserved via Internet Archive
  • Build manuals (PDF format)
  • Forum discussions and solutions
  • Community modifications and upgrades

Modern RepRap Community

RepRap Forums

  • Active community maintaining RepRap heritage
  • Vintage hardware support
  • Modification and upgrade discussions

r/Reprap (Reddit)

  • Modern RepRap development
  • Historical context and preservation
  • Help with legacy hardware

r/3Dprinting (Reddit)

  • General 3D printing community
  • Occasional RapMan discussions
  • Modern alternatives guidance

Frequently Asked Questions

Historical and Context

Was the RapMan 3.1 the first consumer 3D printer?

No, but it was among the first affordable options. While commercial 3D printing existed since the 1980s (stereolithography patents date to 1986), these systems cost $50,000-500,000+. The RapMan 3.1, at £750, was the first to bring professional-quality 3D printing below £1,000, making it accessible to schools, small businesses, and dedicated hobbyists. It competed primarily with MakerBot Industries’ early offerings and preceded later consumer brands like Ultimaker and Formlabs.

What happened to Bits From Bytes?

Bits From Bytes was acquired by 3D Systems Corporation on October 5, 2010, in a move described by industry observers as a “blockbuster announcement.” The company continued operating from its Clevedon, UK headquarters with the original management team for several years. Eventually, 3D Systems integrated the technology into their broader product portfolio and discontinued the RapMan and BfB 3000 product lines around 2013. Some of the technology contributed to 3D Systems’ later “Cube” consumer printer line.

How many RapMan printers were sold?

According to the 2010 Wohlers Report, Bits From Bytes kits and printers accounted for 17% of all 3D printer unit sales worldwide in their first full year of commercial activity (2009-2010), ranking second in total shipments globally. While exact unit numbers weren’t publicly disclosed, this suggests thousands of units worldwide, with particularly strong presence in educational institutions.

Is the RapMan based on RepRap technology?

Yes. The RapMan 3.1 was explicitly based on the RepRap project that originated at the University of Bath, UK. Specifically, it derived from the RepRap Darwin design, with key modifications: laser-cut acrylic frame (instead of 3D-printed parts), custom electronics with OLED display, and standalone operation via SD card. Bits From Bytes maintained the open-source spirit while adding commercial polish, comprehensive documentation, and professional support.

Technical Operation

Can you still use a RapMan 3.1 today?

Yes, though with some caveats. Many RapMan 3.1 units remain operational, particularly in educational institutions and maker spaces. The main challenges are:

  • Spare parts: Original components no longer manufactured, though many can be substituted with modern RepRap parts
  • Software: BfB Axon software still functions on modern Windows systems; Skeinforge remains available open-source
  • Filament: Standard 3mm filament still readily available
  • Support: No official support, but community documentation remains extensive

Some enthusiasts have successfully upgraded RapMan units with modern 32-bit controller boards and contemporary firmware (Marlin, Klipper), significantly improving performance while preserving the original mechanical frame.

What’s the difference between RapMan 3.1 and 3.2?

The RapMan 3.2 represented an evolutionary refinement with better user interface and dual-extrusion option (for support material or multi-color prints), but maintained the same core mechanical design and print quality.

What materials can the RapMan 3.1 print?

Standard configuration:

  • ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene): 235-250°C
  • PLA (Polylactic Acid): 180-200°C

With hot end modifications, advanced users successfully printed:

  • Polypropylene (experimental)
  • Polyethylene (experimental)
  • Nylon variants (requiring higher temperatures)
  • Various experimental materials

Standard 3.0mm diameter filament was required. Modern 1.75mm filament cannot be used without extruder modifications.

Practical Considerations

How long does a RapMan 3.1 take to assemble?

Typical assembly time is 2-3 full days for two people working together:

  • Day 1 (6-8 hours): Mechanical frame construction
  • Day 2 (4-6 hours): Electronics integration
  • Day 3 (6-8 hours): Calibration and first test prints

Experienced builders with prior RepRap knowledge could complete assembly faster (12-16 hours total), while first-timers or educational groups might need additional time.

What print quality can the RapMan 3.1 achieve?

For its era, the RapMan 3.1 delivered impressive quality:

  • Layer height: 0.1mm – 0.3mm (typical 0.2mm)
  • Z resolution: 125 µm minimum
  • X/Y resolution: 200 µm
  • Surface finish: Good with proper calibration, excellent after post-processing
  • Dimensional accuracy: ±0.2-0.5mm typical

While modern printers achieve finer detail and better surface finish, properly calibrated RapMan units produced functional prototypes and mechanical parts meeting real engineering requirements.

How much does it cost to maintain and operate a RapMan 3.1?

Estimated annual costs (moderate use, ~500 hours printing):

  • Filament: $200-400 (depending on material choices and print density)
  • Electricity: ~$30-50 (150W average × hours)
  • Maintenance parts: $50-100 (belts, bearings, nozzles)
  • Unexpected repairs: $0-200 (variable)

Total: $280-750/year for active use. According to 3D Systems’ 2010 acquisition conference call, they estimated $4,000-5,000 annual filament consumption for professional users, though this seems high for typical educational or hobbyist usage.

Comparison and Context

How does the RapMan 3.1 compare to modern 3D printers?

The RapMan 3.1 established fundamental workflows still used today, but modern printers offer significant advantages:

Areas Where Modern Printers Excel:

  • Print speed (10-100× faster)
  • Automatic calibration
  • Quieter operation
  • Better surface finish
  • Network connectivity
  • Failure detection
  • Ease of use

Areas Where RapMan 3.1 Maintains Value:

  • Educational assembly experience
  • Transparent operation for observation
  • Serviceability and repairability
  • Open-source philosophy
  • Historical significance
  • Cost (used units often very affordable)

For actual production use in 2025, modern alternatives clearly win. For education about 3D printing principles, mechanical systems, and maker movement history, the RapMan 3.1 remains valuable.

Is a RapMan 3.1 worth buying in 2025?

Purchase scenarios where it makes sense:

  • Educational institutions teaching 3D printing history
  • Museum collections documenting technology evolution
  • Maker spaces wanting vintage equipment
  • Collectors of early consumer 3D printers
  • Enthusiasts interested in restoration projects
  • Users valuing the assembly/learning experience

When to choose modern alternatives instead:

  • Need for production-quality parts
  • Time-sensitive projects
  • Users wanting “plug and play” operation
  • Commercial applications requiring reliability
  • Anyone prioritizing print quality over educational experience

Used RapMan units occasionally appear for $200-500 when functional, potentially worthwhile for historical interest or educational purposes.

What modern printer is closest to the RapMan 3.1’s philosophy?

The Prusa i3 MK4 kit version best preserves the RapMan’s original spirit:

  • Available as assembly kit (educational value)
  • Open-source firmware and design
  • Extensive documentation and community
  • Upgradeable and repairable
  • Active development and support
  • Derived from RepRap heritage
  • Transparent, observable operation

However, it adds modern conveniences (automatic calibration, network features) that make it more practical while maintaining the maker philosophy.

Software and Workflow

What software do you need to use a RapMan 3.1?

Minimum required:

  1. 3D modeling software (any that exports STL): Tinkercad, SketchUp, FreeCAD
  2. Slicing software: BfB Axon (Windows) or Skeinforge (cross-platform)
  3. File transfer: Standard SD card reader (built into most computers)

Recommended additions:

  • Mesh repair: Netfabb Studio Basic (free) or Meshlab
  • G-code editor: Any text editor for manual adjustments
  • Monitoring tools: USB connection for firmware updates

Modern slicers (Cura, PrusaSlicer, Slic3r) can generate compatible G-code with custom printer profiles, though original software worked better without modification.

Can modern slicing software work with the RapMan 3.1?

Yes, with proper configuration. Modern slicers like Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer, and Slic3r can generate compatible G-code if configured with correct:

  • Build volume dimensions (270×205×210mm)
  • Origin point (center of build plate)
  • Extruder specifications
  • Firmware flavor (RepRap/Marlin-style G-code)
  • Custom start/end G-code sequences

However, BfB Axon and Skeinforge remain most reliable options as they were specifically optimized for RapMan characteristics and quirks.


Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment in Manufacturing History

The RapMan 3.1 represents far more than vintage hardware—it embodies a pivotal moment when desktop manufacturing transitioned from research laboratories to educational institutions, small businesses, and dedicated enthusiasts. For £750 in 2009, Bits From Bytes delivered not just a 3D printer, but an educational experience, a gateway to digital fabrication, and proof that revolutionary manufacturing technology could be democratically accessible.

Legacy and Lasting Impact

The 2010 Wohlers Report’s finding that Bits From Bytes captured 17% of global 3D printer sales validates what many early adopters already knew: the RapMan 3.1 succeeded because it balanced accessibility, educational value, and genuine capability. It proved that you didn’t need a $50,000 industrial machine to explore additive manufacturing—a lesson that spawned an entire industry.

The 3D Systems acquisition marked both an apex and an inflection point. While the RapMan brand eventually disappeared, its influence permeates modern desktop 3D printing: standalone operation via SD cards, comprehensive documentation, open community support, and the belief that users should understand and maintain their machines.

Preservation for Future Generations

This documentation preserves technical knowledge that might otherwise be lost. As museums like CNAP France recognize, the RapMan 3.1 deserves preservation as a significant artifact in the evolution of digital fabrication. Future engineers and historians should understand that today’s multi-color, AI-powered, automated 3D printers stand on foundations built by pioneers like Ian Adkins, Iain Major, and the Bits From Bytes team.

Looking Forward

While no one should choose a RapMan 3.1 over modern alternatives for production work in 2025, its educational value persists. The transparent frame, manual assembly process, and observable operation teach fundamental principles that enclosed, automated modern printers obscure. Sometimes the best way to understand sophisticated technology is to build and calibrate it yourself—exactly what the RapMan 3.1 demanded and enabled.

For those interested in 3D printing history, the maker movement’s origins, or hands-on engineering education, the RapMan 3.1 remains a fascinating artifact worthy of study and, where possible, preservation.


Further Reading and Resources

On This Site:

External Resources:

Modern RepRap Community:


This documentation was compiled from original Bits From Bytes manuals, community resources, educational institution reports, and industry publications to preserve the history and technical knowledge of the RapMan 3.1 3D printer kit.

Last Updated: October 2025

Total
0
Shares
Previous Post
RapMan 3D printer in educational setting with students

Teaching Resources – 3D Printing Education

Next Post
G-code 3D printing Command Documentation

G-Code Reference Guide for 3D Printing – G-code 3D printing Command Documentation

Related Posts